State art funding shouldn't be used to pay for work that appeals “to a self-congratulatory in-group” says Julian Spalding.
From Tracey Emin’s unmade bed to Damien Hirst’s diamond-studded skull, the work of Britain’s avant garde artists has been lauded and derided down the years in almost equal measure. But now one of the country’s leading arts figures is to launch a ferocious attack on work that “rejoices in being incomprehensible to all but a few insiders”.
In a lecture on “the purpose of the arts today”, to be delivered on Monday in London, Julian Spalding, a former director of three of Britain’s foremost museums and galleries, will say that the public purse should only fund work that is “both popular and profound, as truly great art is.” He will also criticise the supporting of works that appeal “to a self-congratulatory in-group”... Keep reading on The Observer
From Tracey Emin’s unmade bed to Damien Hirst’s diamond-studded skull, the work of Britain’s avant garde artists has been lauded and derided down the years in almost equal measure. But now one of the country’s leading arts figures is to launch a ferocious attack on work that “rejoices in being incomprehensible to all but a few insiders”.
In a lecture on “the purpose of the arts today”, to be delivered on Monday in London, Julian Spalding, a former director of three of Britain’s foremost museums and galleries, will say that the public purse should only fund work that is “both popular and profound, as truly great art is.” He will also criticise the supporting of works that appeal “to a self-congratulatory in-group”... Keep reading on The Observer